|
|
Post by peeves on Dec 31, 2021 14:38:54 GMT -5
Maxwell got her comeuppance according to jury verdict.
"Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty by a U.S. jury on Wednesday of helping the late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls, sealing a remarkable fall from grace for the British socialite.
Maxwell, 60, was accused of recruiting and grooming four teenagers for Epstein between 1994 and 2004."
That !!! ---- Maxwell guilt and claim, may precipitate a potential prosecution of Prince Andrew???
"Prince Andrew wasn’t on trial in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking case, but her conviction is bad news for the man who is ninth in line to the British throne.
With the conclusion of the Maxwell case, attention will now turn to a U.S. civil suit in which the plaintiff alleges Maxwell and long-time boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein took her to London, New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands to have sex with Andrew when she was underage."
|
|
|
|
Post by campy on Dec 31, 2021 16:37:48 GMT -5
[[With the conclusion of the Maxwell case, attention will now turn to a U.S. civil suit in which the plaintiff alleges Maxwell and long-time boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein took her to London, New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands to have sex with Andrew when she was underage."]]
Forgive me because that's just the kind of guy I am.
How completely innocent is the one underage, going along with all of this?
Are you trying to tell me she didn't know what was going on and going along with it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 31, 2021 16:57:56 GMT -5
Forgive me because that's just the kind of guy I am. How completely innocent is the one underage, going along with all of this? Are you trying to tell me she didn't know what was going on and going along with it? I wonder that too Campy, where they kidnapped and held against their will, or where they there willingly for the money? Because they are or where underage they are automatically assumed to be victims, maybe not all are. I wonder why she didn't name names and take people down with her, maybe she wasn't allowed to. |
|
|
|
Post by peeves on Jan 2, 2022 11:09:25 GMT -5
Regardless, those underage are not legally able to make such decisions and sex with an underage person is rape.
"Statutory rape is the crime of sex with a minor when the sex is agreed to by both parties, not forced. The reason why it is considered rape is because the minor is considered to be too young to legally consent to have sex or sexual contact.Aug 20, 2021"
Those that prey on minors are breaking the law regardless the minors participation..or not.
What anyone thinks ("Are you trying to tell me she didn't know what was going on and going along with it?") does not change the FACT that they were by law, raped and rapist need to be incarcerated for the crime.
So yes. A minor really doesn't know what's going on, only what they're conditioned into. A minor is just that, yet a child.
Now I may question a child's morals but that does not change the fact that the minor is considered to be too young to legally consent to have sex and too young to realize future consequences.
|
|
|
|
Post by campy on Jan 2, 2022 13:16:08 GMT -5
Peeves legally they can't consent but in reality they can.
What are teenagers doing hanging around with the likes of Maxwell and Epstein.
The law is an ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 2, 2022 14:45:44 GMT -5
My question is; could they have left willingly or where there against their will. Having said that, it is still wrong having minors there for sex, very wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by campy on Jan 6, 2022 8:45:17 GMT -5
Maxwell is now trying for a mistrial.
I read that in the Washington Post.
Apparently two jurors described their personal experiences with child abuse.
The Washington Post has a paywall.
For some reason one of my tablets can access it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 6, 2022 15:54:41 GMT -5
That would be a good reason, it shows bias.
|
|
|
|
Post by campy on Jan 7, 2022 20:26:20 GMT -5
The underage girl settled for $500,000 from Epstein.
|
|
|
|
Post by peeves on Jan 9, 2022 9:39:35 GMT -5
That would be a good reason, it shows bias. Hardly a 'good' reason. The outcome will be the same. The facts are indisputable in my understanding. ...And while 'it' might show bias or prejudice from a juror, there seems to be overwhelming proof that she is a pimp,grooming children and participating in rape.
She and other participants in rape should rot in hell.
A child's decision is in no way sound on a life changing factor. A child does NOT know the future consequences in such a decision. A child being groomed by an adult is an insidious means of molding, shaping of the minds of the intended victim, influencing and guiding their decisions contrary to their best interests. That's what religion does.
That agenda has been well accepted since ..." “Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man.”
― Aristotle, The Philosophy of Aristotle
|
|
